Solutions · For Regulatory Affairs

Carry a safety wording change through to print

Alerts flags new safety wording that applies to your products. Workbench compares your SmPC and leaflet texts with it, and Print ProofReader checks the printed artwork against the approved text for each market.

The problem

One wording change touches every text and pack

A PRAC class wording change has to reach the SmPC, the leaflet and the printed packs in each market. Today someone compares the texts by hand, language by language, then proofs each carton and leaflet against the approved version. EMA's electronic product information (ePI), in FHIR format, starts from the same approved texts.

Text differenceReview
Page 1Text comparison · example
Reference

Store in the original carton.

Artwork

Store in the original container.

The storage wording has changed from “carton” to “container”. Check it against the approved reference.

How it works

From a PRAC wording to a checked pack

Alerts matches the change

Alerts matched PRAC's minutes on sedating antihistamines and OGYEI's request for local confirmation to APAP Noc 500 mg / 25 mg, which contains diphenhydramine.

Workbench compares the texts

Attach the HU and PL SmPCs. Workbench compares section 4.4 in each with the PRAC wording and cites the sentences that are missing or differ, as D1 and D2.

ProofReader checks the print

Once the new text is approved, Print ProofReader compares the carton and leaflet artwork with it for each market and marks missing, added and changed text.

In Workbench

Compare two SmPCs against the PRAC wording

Alerts matched the PRAC minutes to APAP Noc, and Atlas already holds Milan's task to align the HU and PL SmPC section 4.4. Workbench checks both texts before the change is drafted.

Workbench+ New Chat
☷ Quick Tasks / APAP Noc SmPCs against PRAC Sources
You09:14 AM

PRAC wants aligned driving and alcohol wording for sedating antihistamines. Compare section 4.4 in our HU and PL SmPCs for APAP Noc against it. What is missing?

apap-noc-smpc-hu.pdfReady
Regunaut09:14 AM
  1. understanding your question…

    APAP Noc 500 mg / 25 mg · HU and PL national · PRAC class wording

Warning details⌄
  • The PRAC wording is a recommendation until it is agreed. Recheck both SmPCs against the final text.

1. Short answer

Both SmPCs carry an alcohol warning in section 4.4, but the PL text uses older wording. Neither has the PRAC driving sentence, which belongs in section 4.7 rather than 4.4.

2. Gaps by text

TextSectionFinding
HU SmPC4.4 alcoholMatches PRAC wording [D1]
PL SmPC4.4 alcoholOlder wording, replace [D2]
HU and PL SmPC4.7 drivingPRAC sentence missing [1]

3. Next steps

  • Replace the PL section 4.4 alcohol sentence with the PRAC wording.
  • Add the PRAC driving sentence to section 4.7 and leaflet section 2 in both markets.
  • Proof the HU and PL cartons and leaflets once the new text is approved.
Citations (5)⌄
Helpful? Copy PDF
Example response · Condensed for this product demonstration
Ask a follow-up question...↑
Why Regunaut

Each text checked against the wording it must carry

Matched by ingredient

Alerts matched APAP Noc through diphenhydramine, its sedating antihistamine, and lists the HU and PL licences the PRAC wording affects.

Cited sentence by sentence

Workbench quotes the sentence it compared in each SmPC as D1 or D2, next to the PRAC wording it compared it with.

Proofs per market

Print ProofReader compares each market's carton and leaflet with the approved text for that market, and marks missing, added and changed text.

Related on Regunaut

Take your next wording change to print

See Alerts, Workbench and Print ProofReader on your own products and markets in a 30-minute walkthrough.

Book a 30-min walkthrough