Directive or regulation: which act covers what
The two acts are negotiated as one package but work differently. The directive (the new Union code) sets the general rules for medicinal products for human use, including the national procedures, and Member States must transpose it into national law. Our overview of the ten main changes in the new pharmaceutical directive covers that half.
The regulation applies directly in every Member State without transposition. It repeals Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and absorbs the orphan (Regulation (EC) No 141/2000) and paediatric (Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006) regulations (Art. 185). Some topics span both acts: the protection periods are set in the directive and apply to centrally authorised products through Article 30 of the regulation, while the antimicrobial voucher that extends them sits in the regulation.
- Transposed into national law
- Sets the general rules and national procedures
- Replaces Directive 2001/83/EC
- Applies directly, no transposition
- Repeals Regulation (EC) No 726/2004
- Absorbs the orphan and paediatric regulations (Art. 185)
Centralised procedure and assessment timelines
Today
EMA's committee has 210 days to adopt its opinion on a centralised marketing authorisation application.
Agreed text
The CHMP opinion is due within 180 days of a valid application, or 150 days under accelerated assessment (Art. 7(6) and (7)).
As today, the clock stops while the applicant answers. The 180-day limit is suspended while you supplement the dossier or prepare oral or written explanations, and the CHMP can extend the analysis on a duly justified request (Art. 7(6) and Art. 11(1)). New is an early exit: if within 90 days of validation the CHMP finds the data not mature enough, it can set a deadline to fix the deficiencies and terminate the assessment if they are not addressed (Art. 11(2)).
After the opinion, the Commission has 12 days to send a draft decision to the Standing Committee and 12 days from that committee's opinion to decide (Art. 14). For planning, the change mostly affects launch sequencing: dates that depend on the opinion and the decision (pricing and reimbursement filings, supply readiness, artwork) may move earlier.
Day 90: the CHMP can stop an immature application
Counted from a valid application; clock stops for the applicant's answers are excluded. Art. 7(6), 7(7) and 11(2).
A simpler EMA committee structure
Article 148 lists the scientific committees for human medicines as the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) and the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC). The Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) are not on that list.
Their expertise moves into working parties. The CHMP must set up working parties for quality, methodology, non-clinical and clinical evaluation and a scientific advice working party, and where necessary working parties on paediatric and orphan medicines and on environmental risk assessment (Art. 157(2)). Herbal medicines get a Herbal Medicinal Products working group under Article 145 of the directive. The committees keep final responsibility for opinions (Art. 157(1)). Orphan designation, paediatric investigation plans and advanced therapy assessments continue; EMA's procedural guidance will show who adopts which opinion and when.
Today
Agreed text Art. 148
CHMP working parties
Quality · Methodology · Non-clinical · Clinical · Scientific advice
Paediatric, orphan and ERA working parties where necessary (Art. 157(2)). Herbal medicines move to a working group under directive Art. 145.
Regulatory protection and orphan exclusivity
Today
8 years of data protection plus 2 years of market protection, with 1 extra year possible for a significant new indication (the 8+2+1 model). Orphan market exclusivity of 10 years.
Agreed text
8 years of data protection plus 1 year of market protection, up to 2 more conditional years, 11 years at most (directive Art. 83 and 84). Orphan exclusivity of 9 years, 11 for breakthrough orphans (Art. 73).
The baseline periods sit in the directive. Article 30 of the regulation applies them to centrally authorised products, so the rules are the same whichever route a product took. Market protection can be extended by a year for an unmet medical need or for a new active substance meeting comparator and EU-filing or multi-country trial conditions, and by another year for a significant new indication. The conditions are covered in how the new data and market protection periods work.
The orphan rules sit in the regulation. Market exclusivity is nine years, eleven for breakthrough orphan medicines (no authorised treatment and a clinically relevant reduction in morbidity or mortality, Art. 72), and four years for orphans authorised on bibliographic data (Art. 73(2)). It can be extended by 12 months, up to twice, for new indications in different orphan conditions (Art. 74).
Protection periods drive generic entry dates. See planning loss of exclusivity across your portfolio for how Regunaut tracks these dates per product and market. Reference products whose application is submitted before the regulation applies keep the current periods (Art. 186(5)).
Today
Agreed text
Data protectionMarket protectionConditional
Conditional years: unmet need or new active substance, and a significant new indication. Orphans: 9 years, 11 for breakthrough orphans (Art. 72 and 73).
Transferable data exclusivity voucher for priority antimicrobials
The Commission can grant a transferable data exclusivity voucher to a priority antimicrobial: one that addresses a multi-drug resistant organism, shows significant clinical benefit against resistance, and has a new mechanism of action or a new active substance for a serious infection (Art. 41). The applicant must show it can supply the EU market, disclose direct research funding, and file in the EU first or within 180 days of its first filing elsewhere.
The voucher adds 12 months of data protection to one centrally authorised product, the antimicrobial itself or another product of the same or a different company. On another product it can only be used in the fifth or sixth year of data protection, and only if EU gross sales stayed at or below EUR 490 million a year in the first four years. It can be transferred once, the buyer must report the price to EMA within 30 days, and it lapses if unused after five years (Art. 42 and 43). The scheme ends after five vouchers or 15 years from entry into force, whichever comes first (Art. 44). The other antimicrobial obligations, such as stewardship plans, are covered in antimicrobial stewardship and the new obligations for antimicrobials.
- +12 mo
- data protection on one centrally authorised product
- 1
- transfer allowed; price reported to EMA within 30 days
- EUR 490m
- yearly EU sales cap for use on another product
- 5 yrs
- to use it before it lapses
The scheme ends after five vouchers or 15 years from entry into force, whichever comes first. Art. 41 to 44.
Bolar exemption
Today
The exemption in Article 10(6) of Directive 2001/83/EC covers the studies and trials needed for a generic or biosimilar application. Member States have implemented its scope differently.
Agreed text
Patents and SPCs are not infringed by activities needed for MA applications and variations, health technology assessment, pricing and reimbursement, related practical steps, and tender submissions (directive Art. 87).
The Bolar provision sits in the directive, but it affects any reference product, centrally authorised or not. The covered activities can include manufacture, supply, storage and import, including by third-party suppliers, and tender submissions are covered as long as nothing is sold or offered for sale during the patent or SPC term. Placing the product on the market is not covered (Art. 87(3)). Competitors can therefore be ready to launch soon after protection ends.
- MA applications and variations
- Health technology assessment
- Pricing and reimbursement
- Manufacture, supply, storage, import
- Tender submissions
- Placing the product on the market
During the patent or SPC term, nothing may be sold or offered for sale. Directive Art. 87.
Shortage prevention obligations
The shortage rules sit in the regulation and apply to nationally and centrally authorised products alike. Marketing authorisation holders must notify at least 12 months before permanently ceasing supply in a Member State or requesting withdrawal of an MA, and at least six months before a temporary suspension or a disruption expected to last more than two weeks (Art. 120). Every prescription medicine needs an up-to-date shortage prevention plan, to be handed over within two days of a request (Art. 121). Holders of critical medicines must offer to transfer the MA or grant a letter of access before withdrawing (Art. 120(4)).
Timing differs from the rest of the package: the agreed text provides for Articles 120 to 132 to apply six months after entry into force, and the critical medicines provisions (Articles 133 to 140) from entry into force (Art. 187). Notice periods, plan contents and the scope of products covered are explained in shortage prevention plans and notification duties.
12 months
before permanently ceasing supply or withdrawing an MA
6 months
before a temporary suspension, or a disruption over two weeks
2 days
to hand over the shortage prevention plan on request
Articles 120 to 132 apply six months after entry into force; the critical medicines rules from entry into force (Art. 187).
Regulatory sandboxes
The Commission may set up a regulatory sandbox case by case, on EMA's recommendation, where a medicine cannot be developed and authorised in full compliance with the current requirements because of its methods or characteristics, and those features are likely to improve quality, safety or efficacy or patient access (Art. 116). A sandbox allows targeted technical adaptations under the direct supervision of the national competent authorities, for a limited time.
The product still needs an MA with a favourable benefit-risk balance (Art. 117).
- 1
EMA recommends one where a medicine cannot be developed in full compliance with current rules
- 2
Commission sets it up case by case, for a limited time
- 3
National authorities supervise the targeted adaptations
- 4
Marketing authorisation still required, with a favourable benefit-risk balance
Art. 116 and 117.
What to do now
The substance is agreed; the dates are not. These steps do not depend on the final application dates:
- Split your portfolio by route. List which products are centrally authorised and which are national, decentralised or mutual recognition. Regulation obligations apply directly; directive obligations arrive through national law, possibly at different times.
- Re-baseline centralised timelines. For applications planned after the new rules apply, model a 180-day assessment and the 90-day maturity check, and check whether your response capacity and launch dependencies still fit.
- Review protection and loss of exclusivity dates. For pipeline products, model the 8+1 baseline and which extensions are realistic. Marketed products, and products whose application is filed before the new rules apply, keep today's periods, but the wider Bolar exemption can bring competitor readiness forward.
- Start the shortage prevention groundwork. These rules apply earlier than the rest of the package. Collect supplier, site and stock data per product and agree who owns the plan, so drafting is quick once EMA's guidance on content is published.
- Screen antimicrobial candidates. If you develop antimicrobials, check whether any candidate could qualify as a priority antimicrobial, and whether a voucher would be used in-house or sold.
- Track the remaining steps. Follow the Parliament vote, publication and the guidance that follows on the legislative timeline of the pharma package, and use Alerts to monitor EMA and national authority updates as implementing acts and procedural guidance appear.
Frequently asked questions
Is the new pharmaceutical regulation already in force?
Not yet. Status on 19 October 2026: adopted by the Council; Parliament's final vote expected 23 November 2026. Latest completed step: European Parliament second reading opens (8 October 2026). Next step: European Parliament plenary vote. The regulation enters into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal. The agreed text provides for most of it to apply 24 months after entry into force, with the voucher and critical medicines rules applying from entry into force and the shortage notification rules six months after it (Art. 187). The calendar dates will be fixed by the published act.
Does the regulation need to be transposed into national law?
No. An EU regulation applies directly in every Member State. The directive half of the package is different: under the agreed text, Member States have 24 months from its entry into force to transpose it (Art. 222 of the directive).
Which current EU laws does the regulation replace?
It repeals Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (the centralised procedure and the European Medicines Agency), Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 (orphan medicines) and Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 (paediatric medicines), and brings their rules into the one act (Art. 185).
Will the 180-day assessment apply to applications already under review?
No. Applications submitted before the regulation applies, and still pending then, are completed under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, which carries the current 210-day timetable (Art. 186(2)).
Where are the data and market protection periods set?
In the directive. Article 30 of the regulation says centrally authorised products benefit from the protection periods in Chapter VII of the directive (Articles 83 to 86), so the same 8+1 baseline and conditional extensions apply whichever route a product took. The regulation adds the data exclusivity voucher and the orphan market exclusivity rules. Reference products whose application is submitted before the regulation applies keep the current periods (Art. 186(5)).